Open Theist Thomas J Oord criticizes Open Theist John Sanders on the problem of evil:
In The God Who Risks, Sanders often says God permits evil when it could have been prevented (all quotations in this blog come from that book)…
Sanders’s position ends up sounding like a “best of all possible worlds” defense to the problem of evil. According to it, God allows evil because preventing it would undermine the good of the overall project. Sanders admits that many atrocities are “pointless evils” and “God does not have a specific purpose in mind for these occurrences.” But he also seems to believe “some evils are justified for some greater good.”
I find it difficult to imagine how God preventing rape and murder in any particular instance would throw out of balance the structures of the universe. I am not convinced the creation project requires God to allow genuine evils – including the Boston Marathon bombing, the debilitating condition of severely handicapped infants, the rape and murder of innocent women, and countless other atrocities.
I’m not sure… but it seems to me that Dr. Sanders just meant that God does generally not stop free will (decisions). And that He can use evil for good (as in the crucifixion of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ).