One belief of Calvinism is that God decrees child rape. This makes James White uneasy, as evident by his refusal to answer very basic questions during his debate with Bob Enyart. As a debate follow-up, White still shows that he is disturbed by his own belief that God decrees child rape. White’s argument: not only does God decree child rape, but everything (so ignore God decreeing the child rape). How does God decreeing child torture and child beheading absolve God of evil for decreeing child rape? No one knows.
James White’s most delusional statement: “Where have I never not answered this question directly?”
Starting at the 54:00 mark:
God is Open 
What I’d like to see White answer is how he can believe in moral absolutes. White will say that it is absolutely immoral for a human to setup a child-rape, but he will also say God is righteous to setup a child-rape. But “absolute” means “no exceptions”. If then God is an exception, then child rape cannot be ‘absolutely’ evil. And yet most of us think “no exceptions” when we declare child-rape to be ‘absolutely’ evil. Is that the part where White suddenly discovers the manifold wisdom within his enemy Norman Geisler’s “graded absolutism”? LOL
Just watched this. The Calvinist got absolutely EXPOSED! Spectacular argument on your end.